Skip to main content

Free Shipping on Orders Over $99

Orders are shipped within 1-2 business days and arrive within 3-10 business days. Need it sooner? Concerned about the environmental impact? Flexible shipping options are available.

More Details

Earth Is Now Our Only Shareholder

If we have any hope of a thriving planet—much less a business—it is going to take all of us doing what we can with the resources we have. This is what we can do.

Read Yvon’s Letter

Two Big Threats to Yellowstone – Take action now

 /  Aug 19, 2015 8 Min Read  /  Activism


Long before the arrival of Europeans, native peoples referred to Yellowstone as the “land of yellow rock waters” for the distinctive stone forged by volcanic blasts and the boiling waters of the largest geothermal system in the world. By 1872, Congress had dedicated Yellowstone as the nation’s—and the world’s—first national park. Yellowstone thus predates the states of Wyoming, Idaho and Montana and the Department of Interior—and of course the Park Service itself. The Congress of the day may have specified Yellowstone Park as a “pleasuring-ground,” but a century and a half of protection has created something far more valuable than a spot to snap pictures. In the words of the Park Service, as a “mountain wildland, home to grizzly bears, wolves, and herds of bison and elk, the park is the core of one of the last, nearly intact, natural ecosystems in the Earth’s temperate zone.”

This is precisely what is at stake now for Yellowstone as the National Park Service approaches its centennial. The challenge rests not with the Park Service itself, which has earmarked more than $2 million for worthy restoration projects, but in two related outside threats.

Above: Fish and Wildlife Service is making its second attempt in a decade to delist the Yellowstone grizzly as an endangered species. Doing so would would remove a major obstacle in the path of a proposed gold mine just 30 miles north of the Yellowstone Park boundary. Photo: R. Bear Stands Last, courtesy of the GOAL Tribal Coalition  

First, a Canadian mining company with an ominous name, Lucky Minerals, has proposed exploratory drilling for gold in Emigrant Gulch and on Emigrant Peak, in tributary drainages of the Yellowstone River just 30 miles north of the Yellowstone Park boundary. The local Park County Environmental Council and the larger regional group, the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, have investigated papers filed by the mining company with Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality and the U.S. Forest Service. The groups’ research unveils an ambitious scheme that includes the amassing of dozens of new mining claims, purchase of private patented claims in the area and a proposal for a mine occupying 2,500 acres (or the equivalent in land of 7,500 suburban houses).


Emigrant community meeting (1)_3Park County Environmental Council’s Michelle Uberuaga presents to a packed room in Emigrant, Montana. Photo: Bill Zanoni


Emigrant_Peak and ChicoEmigrant Peak touches the clouds and looms high above the Paradise Valley, Chico Hot Springs and the Yellowstone River. Local residents argue that this place is invaluable because of its connectivity to the largest intact ecosystem in the lower 48, Yellowstone National Park, and it’s connectivity to the community's water source and lifeblood of the economy, the Yellowstone River. “It is more valuable than gold.” Photo: Bill Campbell, made possible by EcoFlight


Emigrant_Gulch and CreekLooking east just behind Emigrant Peak lies Emigrant Gulch and Emigrant Creek. This would be the primary location for Lucky Minerals’ activity. Lucky proposes drilling 70 exploratory drill sites on both private and public land, including inside inventoried roadless areas. Photo: Bill Campbell, made possible by EcoFlight


Meanwhile, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is making its second attempt in a decade to delist the Yellowstone grizzly as an endangered species. The reasons given—we’ll outline those below—don’t pass the political smell test. So far, major regional and national environmental players have not yet mobilized to take effective action, even though delisting would remove a major obstacle in the path of Lucky Minerals and the proposed Emigrant mine. The majority of public comments sent so far to the U.S. Forest Service and Montana Department of Environmental Quality in response to Lucky Minerals’ mineral exploration argue that the presence of the endangered Yellowstone grizzly and the invasion of its critical habitat are grounds to stop Lucky’s scheme. The Paradise Valley community appears willing to go to bat for the bear.

As of now, though, it is Native Americans who have united and taken the strongest action. These tribes flourished in Yellowstone’s high country for thousands of years before European explorers and settlers arrived. Their descendants still see grizzly bears as relatives, healers and guides. To them, killing grizzly bears as trophies and mounting their heads is sacrilegious and deeply disturbing.

In an unprecedented co-operative effort, 35 tribes have passed formal resolutions to oppose delisting. At the center of this effort is Guardians of Our Ancestors Legacy (GOAL). In September, tribal leaders will make their case personally to Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, asking her to intervene with Fish and Wildlife, which failed, contrary to law, to consult with the tribes before recommending delisting. We add our voice to that of the tribes and we hope you will too—for the sake of the grizzly itself, and to protect its much-needed habitat from threats that include the mine.


Scan_130421_0056-227-800-600-80Photo: Doug Peacock


Here’s the case made for delisting: Since passage of the Endangered Species Act, the grizzly population in Yellowstone has risen from as few as 150 to perhaps more than 700; that grizzlies in the Yellowstone region have therefore recovered; and that the local states (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming) should be free to issue hunting licenses to prevent the population from exceeding carrying capacity.

Fish and Wildlife first delisted the Yellowstone grizzly in 2007, citing this successful return to sustainable numbers. Environmental groups said not so fast and sued, citing ongoing endangerment due to the collapse of important foods: spawning cutthroat trout and the seeds of whitebark pines, both victims of a warming climate. A federal judge ordered the grizzly back on the endangered list in 2009 and a study of the effects on bears from loss of critical foods. That study, now completed, concludes that grizzlies have adapted by finding energy and nutrients from other sources. FWS says it now has the evidence it needs and intends, again, to delist. (To go deeper in the weeds, read this excellent analysis by Doug Peacock.)

We take issue with this decision on several grounds.

Though an increase in bear population from 150 to 700 is impressive as a percentage, the current census, spread over several hundred square miles, represents a contingent, not a triumphant, success. The population is no longer growing and most likely declining. Connectivity remains a problem; Yellowstone’s grizzlies remain isolated from their cousins in Glacier, a few hundred miles to the north. Until grizzlies have the corridors they need to ensure their genetic health, in the opinion of many wildlife biologists, they remain endangered.

Moreover, grizzly habitat is vulnerable to the effects of accelerating climatic change, which hasn’t been fully assessed. In response to loss of whitebark pine, grizzly bears are turning more to meat, particularly elk and livestock, with often deadly consequences from run-ins with elk hunters and ranchers. This is not the time to delist any endangered animal in the region, let alone an indicator species like the grizzly, which has the lowest reproductive rate of any land mammal in North America.


Scan_130421_0021-225-800-600-80Photo: Doug Peacock


And there is the politics. The federal government provides stricter protections for wildlife than do the states of Idaho, Montana or Wyoming. Delisting grizzlies takes the feds out of the picture and hands the regulatory power to the states, whose laws are not as strong as they need to be—and where pressure is strong from legislators and private interests to enforce them lightly. Allowing a grizzly bear sport hunt, which the states aim to do, will exacerbate the problem of excessive mortalities that could push the population back to the brink of extinction.

Interaction between humans and bears will continue to be a sensitive issue. Much more can be done to reduce conflicts with big game hunters and ranchers.

We published an article several years ago by Ted Kerasote about a third-generation Montana rancher whose father once routinely killed grizzlies on his property. His dying wish was that his son let the grizzlies—starting then to make their comeback—live in peace on their land. And the son made it happen by changing a few practices: breeding the herd earlier in the year, so the calves would be stronger when they reached their summer pasture practices; by working with Montana wildlife managers to distribute cow carcasses to the ranches’ perimeter. He also bred fewer head of cattle but allowed them to reach greater weight. He earned the same profit on 300 head as another rancher would make on 600, with lower expenses and less environmental impact.

These are wise practices that if widely adopted would help grizzlies and humans co-exist, but they are not now widespread. Meanwhile, an old regional cultural myth has taken even deeper root, that grizzlies can’t stay where humans live and work. This is rarely spoken aloud, but is the source of much of the pressure exerted by the states on Fish and Wildlife to delist.

To let the grizzlies live and thrive is possible, even in a time of difficult climate transition. It is also necessary. That’s the consensus of the 35 native western tribes who oppose delisting. And we agree. Issuing licenses to hunt grizzlies as trophies is not a solution for our time. It is long past overdue to restore corridors to give grizzlies safe passage to roam and reduce their isolation. It’s necessary to keep a careful eye on the effects on all wildlife of the climate changes now in early but unmistakable stages in the northern West.


Grizz2Photo: R. Bear Stands Last, courtesy of the GOAL Tribal Coalition


Big environmental groups, take note. Fight the Emigrant Gulch mine but also defend the grizzly, whose legitimate listing as an endangered species can help in the fight to prevent the drilling, subsequent development and pollution of the Yellowstone River. Take the lead from the tribes, whose power is in their moral clarity, the solidarity of conviction and their good nose for bad politics. They don’t like the smell wafting from this decision. Neither do we.


Take Action!

Take_action_largeAdd your voice to the growing movement on these two important issues.

Step 1: Visit Park County Environmental Council and submit a comment to stop drilling in Emigrant Gulch before August 20, 2015

Step 2:
Then join us in an appeal to Secretary Jewell to keep the griz on the endangered species list. Email or write her a letter before September 15, 2015 to add your voice to that of the tribal leaders. It can be short. Just include this sentence: “Please keep the Yellowstone grizzly on the endangered species list.” 

Together we can help ensure that when the Park Service turns 100 next year Yellowstone remains a thriving ecosystem worthy of being the first national park in history. 


Popular searches